ChainPick

MetaMask vs Phantom

A detailed head-to-head comparison of MetaMask and Phantom — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

M

MetaMask

The most widely used self-custody browser wallet for EVM chains

4.2(2,341)

MetaMask is the default entry point into Web3 for the vast majority of users — a browser extension and mobile app that gives you a self-custody Ethereum wallet without running a full node. It connects

Full review →
P

Phantom

The most popular Solana wallet, now multichain with Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Base support

4.6(4,820)

Phantom is the dominant wallet in the Solana ecosystem with over 15 million users, and has evolved from a Solana-only wallet into a true multichain product covering Solana, Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Bi

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureMetaMaskPhantom
Self Custody
Hardware Wallet Support
Evm Chains
Non Evm ChainsVia Snaps
Mobile App
Browser Extension
In App Swap
Nft Support
Snaps Extensibility
Multi Sig

MetaMask Pricing

MetaMask

Free

Free

  • All EVM chains
  • Hardware wallet support
  • MetaMask Snaps
  • In-app swap (0.875% fee)
  • NFT support
Get Started

MetaMask

MetaMask Institutional

Custom

  • MPC custody
  • Multi-approver workflows
  • DeFi integrations
  • Audit trail
  • Compliance reporting
Contact Sales

Phantom Pricing

Phantom

Free

Free

  • Solana + Ethereum + Base + Bitcoin
  • Built-in swap (0.85% fee)
  • NFT gallery
  • Staking
  • dApp browser
  • Hardware wallet support
Get Started

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

MetaMask is the better pick if you need universal dapp compatibility — every evm dapp supports metamask first. Phantom wins when best solana wallet ux — handles compressed nfts, staking, and defi seamlessly. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.