ChainPick

MetaMask vs Safe

A detailed head-to-head comparison of MetaMask and Safe — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

M

MetaMask

The most widely used self-custody browser wallet for EVM chains

4.2(2,341)

MetaMask is the default entry point into Web3 for the vast majority of users — a browser extension and mobile app that gives you a self-custody Ethereum wallet without running a full node. It connects

Full review →
S

Safe

The standard multi-sig smart contract wallet for DAO treasuries and teams

4.6(987)

Safe is the de facto standard for multi-signature treasury management in Web3. It is a smart contract wallet — not an EOA — which means it requires M-of-N signatures from a defined set of owners befor

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureMetaMaskSafe
Self Custody
Hardware Wallet Support
Evm Chains
Non Evm ChainsVia Snaps
Mobile App
Browser Extension
In App Swap
Nft Support
Snaps Extensibility
Multi Sig

MetaMask Pricing

MetaMask

Free

Free

  • All EVM chains
  • Hardware wallet support
  • MetaMask Snaps
  • In-app swap (0.875% fee)
  • NFT support
Get Started

MetaMask

MetaMask Institutional

Custom

  • MPC custody
  • Multi-approver workflows
  • DeFi integrations
  • Audit trail
  • Compliance reporting
Contact Sales

Safe Pricing

Safe

Free

Free

  • Multi-sig smart contract wallet
  • All supported chains
  • Safe Apps ecosystem
  • Transaction queue
  • Open source
Get Started

Safe

Enterprise

Custom

  • Dedicated infrastructure
  • SLA
  • Custom integrations
  • Compliance tooling
Contact Sales

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

MetaMask is the better pick if you need universal dapp compatibility — every evm dapp supports metamask first. Safe wins when industry-standard multi-sig — $100b+ secured, audited contracts, battle-tested. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.