ChainPick

MetaMask vs Trezor

A detailed head-to-head comparison of MetaMask and Trezor — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

M

MetaMask

The most widely used self-custody browser wallet for EVM chains

4.2(2,341)

MetaMask is the default entry point into Web3 for the vast majority of users — a browser extension and mobile app that gives you a self-custody Ethereum wallet without running a full node. It connects

Full review →
T

Trezor

The original open-source hardware wallet — fully auditable firmware for maximum security

4.4(2,840)

Trezor is the world's first hardware wallet, created by SatoshiLabs in 2014, and remains the gold standard for security-conscious users who prioritize open-source transparency over brand recognition.

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureMetaMaskTrezor
Self Custody
Hardware Wallet Support
Evm Chains
Non Evm ChainsVia Snaps
Mobile App
Browser Extension
In App Swap
Nft Support
Snaps Extensibility
Multi Sig

MetaMask Pricing

MetaMask

Free

Free

  • All EVM chains
  • Hardware wallet support
  • MetaMask Snaps
  • In-app swap (0.875% fee)
  • NFT support
Get Started

MetaMask

MetaMask Institutional

Custom

  • MPC custody
  • Multi-approver workflows
  • DeFi integrations
  • Audit trail
  • Compliance reporting
Contact Sales

Trezor Pricing

Trezor

Trezor Safe 3 (~$79)

Custom

  • 9,000+ coins
  • Open source firmware
  • Passphrase support
  • Trezor Suite app
  • USB-C
Contact Sales

Trezor

Trezor Model T (~$169)

Custom

  • Touchscreen
  • 9,000+ coins
  • microSD backup
  • Trezor Suite
  • USB-C
Contact Sales

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

MetaMask is the better pick if you need universal dapp compatibility — every evm dapp supports metamask first. Trezor wins when fully open source firmware — every security claim is independently verifiable. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.