A head-to-head comparison of 1inch and KyberSwap — pricing, the features that actually differ, and which one fits which use case.
The original DEX aggregator — best-price routing across 300+ liquidity sources
Multi-chain DEX aggregator with dynamic routing across 30+ networks
These are the 4 capabilities where the two tools genuinely diverge — the rest of their feature sets overlap.
| Capability | 1inch | KyberSwap |
|---|---|---|
| Gasless Swaps | Yes | No |
| Mev Protection | Yes | No |
| Mobile App | Yes | No |
| Liquidity Sources | 300+ | Many DEXs across 30+ chains |
| Feature | 1inch | KyberSwap |
|---|---|---|
| Gasless Swaps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Limit Orders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi Chain Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mev Protection | ✓ | ✗ |
| Api Access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile App | ✓ | ✗ |
| Liquidity Sources | 300+ | Many DEXs across 30+ chains |
| Price Impact Estimate | ✓ | ✓ |
| Slippage Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Governance Token | ✓ | ✓ |
Both tools are free to use — costs come from network or usage fees.
1inch
Free
KyberSwap
Free
Watch out: UI can be overwhelming for non-technical users compared to Uniswap's simplicity.
Watch out: Past exploit created reputational headwinds.
1inch edges ahead on our editorial score (4.6/5), but these tools aren’t straight substitutes. Pick 1inch when pathfinder routing engine produces best net price across 300+ liquidity sources matters most to your workflow; pick KyberSwap when broad coverage across 30+ networks is the priority. The deciding factor is usually the trade-off you can least afford — 1inch means accepting that ui can be overwhelming for non-technical users compared to uniswap's simplicity, while KyberSwap means past exploit created reputational headwinds.
1inch carries the higher editorial rating (4.6/5 vs 4/5), but they solve different problems. 1inch is the stronger pick when you need pathfinder routing engine produces best net price across 300+ liquidity sources. KyberSwap wins when broad coverage across 30+ networks.
Both tools are free to use, with costs coming from network or usage fees rather than subscriptions.
1inch's main limitation is that ui can be overwhelming for non-technical users compared to uniswap's simplicity. For KyberSwap, past exploit created reputational headwinds. Weigh these against how you actually plan to use the tool.
In most cases yes — many teams run both, using each where it's strongest. Since 1inch leads on pathfinder routing engine produces best net price across 300+ liquidity sources and KyberSwap on broad coverage across 30+ networks, the two are often complementary rather than mutually exclusive.