ChainPick

Across Protocol vs Celer cBridge

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Across Protocol and Celer cBridge — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

A

Across Protocol

Intent-based cross-chain bridge with the fastest settlement and lowest fees on EVM routes

4.6(1,240)

Across Protocol is an intent-based bridge that has become the fastest and most capital-efficient way to move assets between Ethereum mainnet and its major Layer 2 networks — Arbitrum, Optimism, Base,

Full review →
C

Celer cBridge

Decentralized multi-chain bridge supporting 40+ networks

4.1(156)

Celer cBridge is the bridging product of the Celer Network, a decentralized, non-custodial bridge supporting 40+ blockchains and backed by an extensive history of independent security audits. It offer

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureAcross ProtocolCeler cBridge
Settlement Time~2 minutes~5-20 min
Bridge ModelIntent-based (relayer network)Liquidity pool + canonical
Fee ModelDynamic LP fee onlyBridge fee
Canonical Security
Cross Chain Messages
Governance Token
Multi Chain
Self Custody
Arbitrary Messaging
Non Evm Support

Across Protocol Pricing

Across Protocol

Free (LP fee only)

Free

  • 12+ EVM chains
  • ~2 minute settlement
  • 0.05–0.15% LP fee
  • USDC, ETH, WBTC, DAI, USDT
  • No protocol fee
Get Started

Celer cBridge Pricing

Celer cBridge

Free (bridge fee only)

Free

  • 40+ chain support
  • Liquidity + canonical bridging
  • Celer IM messaging framework
  • Extensive audit history
  • CELR-secured network
Get Started

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Across Protocol is the better pick if you need fastest evm bridge — ~2 minutes vs hours for canonical bridges. Celer cBridge wins when supports 40+ blockchains. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.