ChainPick

Across Protocol vs Chainlink CCIP

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Across Protocol and Chainlink CCIP — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

A

Across Protocol

Intent-based cross-chain bridge with the fastest settlement and lowest fees on EVM routes

4.6(1,240)

Across Protocol is an intent-based bridge that has become the fastest and most capital-efficient way to move assets between Ethereum mainnet and its major Layer 2 networks — Arbitrum, Optimism, Base,

Full review →
C

Chainlink CCIP

Enterprise-grade cross-chain protocol with defense-in-depth security

4.5(118)

Chainlink CCIP (Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol) is Chainlink's cross-chain messaging and token-transfer protocol, built with an emphasis on security and reliability befitting Chainlink's role a

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureAcross ProtocolChainlink CCIP
Settlement Time~2 minutes~5-20 min
Bridge ModelIntent-based (relayer network)Oracle network + Risk Mgmt Network
Fee ModelDynamic LP fee onlyLINK/token fee
Canonical Security
Cross Chain Messages
Governance Token
Multi Chain
Self Custody
Arbitrary Messaging
Non Evm Support

Across Protocol Pricing

Across Protocol

Free (LP fee only)

Free

  • 12+ EVM chains
  • ~2 minute settlement
  • 0.05–0.15% LP fee
  • USDC, ETH, WBTC, DAI, USDT
  • No protocol fee
Get Started

Chainlink CCIP Pricing

Chainlink CCIP

Free (bridge fee only)

Free

  • Cross-chain messaging + token transfers
  • Independent Risk Management Network
  • Defense-in-depth security
  • Enterprise/institutional focus
  • Fees in LINK/tokens
Get Started

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Across Protocol is the better pick if you need fastest evm bridge — ~2 minutes vs hours for canonical bridges. Chainlink CCIP wins when security-first, defense-in-depth design. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.