ChainPick

Across Protocol vs deBridge

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Across Protocol and deBridge — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

A

Across Protocol

Intent-based cross-chain bridge with the fastest settlement and lowest fees on EVM routes

4.6(1,240)

Across Protocol is an intent-based bridge that has become the fastest and most capital-efficient way to move assets between Ethereum mainnet and its major Layer 2 networks — Arbitrum, Optimism, Base,

Full review →
d

deBridge

High-performance cross-chain infrastructure with $9B+ moved and zero exploits

4.6(134)

deBridge is a high-performance cross-chain infrastructure protocol known for very fast transfers (often under a minute), a strong security record, and a design that avoids pooled liquidity risk. Rathe

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureAcross ProtocoldeBridge
Settlement Time~2 minutes<1 min typical
Bridge ModelIntent-based (relayer network)Intent / solver network (DLN)
Fee ModelDynamic LP fee onlySolver + protocol fee
Canonical Security
Cross Chain Messages
Governance Token
Multi Chain
Self Custody
Arbitrary Messaging
Non Evm Support

Across Protocol Pricing

Across Protocol

Free (LP fee only)

Free

  • 12+ EVM chains
  • ~2 minute settlement
  • 0.05–0.15% LP fee
  • USDC, ETH, WBTC, DAI, USDT
  • No protocol fee
Get Started

deBridge Pricing

deBridge

Free (bridge fee only)

Free

  • Intent-based fast transfers
  • No pooled-liquidity honeypot
  • EVM + Solana support
  • deBridge DLN messaging
  • $9B+ moved, zero exploits
Get Started

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Across Protocol is the better pick if you need fastest evm bridge — ~2 minutes vs hours for canonical bridges. deBridge wins when very fast transfers, often under a minute. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.