ChainPick

Across Protocol vs Squid

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Across Protocol and Squid — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

A

Across Protocol

Intent-based cross-chain bridge with the fastest settlement and lowest fees on EVM routes

4.6(1,240)

Across Protocol is an intent-based bridge that has become the fastest and most capital-efficient way to move assets between Ethereum mainnet and its major Layer 2 networks — Arbitrum, Optimism, Base,

Full review →
S

Squid

Cross-chain swap router built on Axelar's General Message Passing

4.2(88)

Squid is a cross-chain liquidity router built on top of Axelar's interoperability network, enabling one-click any-token-to-any-token swaps across chains by combining Axelar's General Message Passing w

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureAcross ProtocolSquid
Settlement Time~2 minutes~1-10 min
Bridge ModelIntent-based (relayer network)Router on Axelar GMP
Fee ModelDynamic LP fee onlySwap + Axelar fee
Canonical Security
Cross Chain Messages
Governance Token
Multi Chain
Self Custody
Arbitrary Messaging
Non Evm Support

Across Protocol Pricing

Across Protocol

Free (LP fee only)

Free

  • 12+ EVM chains
  • ~2 minute settlement
  • 0.05–0.15% LP fee
  • USDC, ETH, WBTC, DAI, USDT
  • No protocol fee
Get Started

Squid Pricing

Squid

Free (bridge fee only)

Free

  • One-click cross-chain swaps
  • Built on Axelar GMP
  • Any-to-any with DEX swaps
  • Strong Cosmos + EVM reach
  • Embedded in many apps
Get Started

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Across Protocol is the better pick if you need fastest evm bridge — ~2 minutes vs hours for canonical bridges. Squid wins when built on axelar's decentralized security. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.