ChainPick

Anchor vs WalletConnect (Reown)

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Anchor and WalletConnect (Reown) — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

A

Anchor

The dominant framework for building Solana programs in Rust

4.5(156)

Anchor is the dominant framework for developing Solana programs (smart contracts), providing a Rust-based framework that dramatically simplifies Solana development by handling much of the boilerplate,

Full review →
W

WalletConnect (Reown)

The open standard connecting wallets to dApps across the ecosystem

4.4(187)

WalletConnect (whose developer platform is now Reown) is the open protocol and standard that connects wallets to dApps, letting users securely link their mobile or browser wallet to a decentralized ap

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureAnchorWalletConnect (Reown)
Local Node
Mainnet Forking
LanguageRust (Solana)TypeScript / multi
Test Framework
Plugin Ecosystem
Debugging
Deployment System
Open Source
Coverage Reporting
Gas Reporting

Anchor Pricing

Anchor

Free (Open Source)

Free

  • Solana program framework
  • Declarative account constraints
  • IDL + TypeScript client generation
  • Built-in security guardrails
  • Rust-based
Get Started

WalletConnect (Reown) Pricing

WalletConnect (Reown)

Free

Free

  • Wallet-to-dApp connection standard
  • AppKit connection UI
  • Hundreds of wallets
  • Multi-chain
Get Started

WalletConnect (Reown)

Pro

$49/mo

$490/yr billed annually

  • Higher limits
  • Advanced features
  • Analytics
  • Priority support
Get Started

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Anchor is the better pick if you need the dominant solana development framework. WalletConnect (Reown) wins when the open standard for wallet-dapp connection. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.