Ankr vs Grove
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Ankr and Grove — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Ankr
Multi-chain RPC infrastructure with a decentralized node network
Ankr is a major Web3 infrastructure provider offering RPC and node services across 75+ blockchains, combining a global node network with a decentralized-infrastructure ethos. It provides public and pr…
Full review →Grove
Managed RPC gateway built on Pocket Network's decentralized node supply
Grove is a managed RPC gateway operated by the Pocket Network team, giving builders the resilience of Pocket's decentralized node supply without the complexity of interacting with the decentralized pr…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Ankr | Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Apis | ✓ | ✗ |
| Webhook Notifications | ✗ | ✗ |
| Archive Node Access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Account Abstraction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Sdk Available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi Chain Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated Nodes | ✓ | ✗ |
| Websocket Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Debug Trace Api | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mev Protection | ✗ | ✗ |
Ankr Pricing
Ankr
Growth
$49/mo
$490/yr billed annually
- ✓Higher limits
- ✓Premium endpoints
- ✓Enhanced APIs
Grove Pricing
Grove
Free
Free
- ✓Managed decentralized RPC
- ✓Pocket node supply
- ✓Many chains
- ✓Per-request pricing
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Ankr is the better pick if you need rpc across 75+ blockchains. Grove wins when decentralized resilience with managed ease. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.