ChainPick

BullX vs Photon (2026)

A head-to-head comparison of BullX and Photon — pricing, the features that actually differ, and which one fits which use case.

At a glance

B

BullX

The hybrid Telegram + web terminal trading bot with TradingView charts and advanced order types

4.4(1,840)
Starting price
Free
Free plan
Yes
Best for
Only major bot with both Telegram interface and full TradingView web terminal
Full BullX review →
P

Photon

The fastest Solana web-based trading interface — sub-second execution with real-time chart updates

4.3(1,240)
Starting price
Free
Free plan
Yes
Best for
Fastest Solana web trading UI — sub-second chart updates outpace browser-based competition
Full Photon review →

Where BullX and Photon differ

These are the 4 capabilities where the two tools genuinely diverge — the rest of their feature sets overlap.

CapabilityBullXPhoton
ChainsEthereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Base, ArbitrumSolana
Telegram InterfaceYesNo
Trading View ChartsYes
Security ScannerYes

Full feature comparison

FeatureBullXPhoton
ChainsEthereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Base, ArbitrumSolana
Telegram Interface
Web Terminal
Trading View Charts
Limit Orders
Copy Trading
Sniping
Security Scanner
Multi Wallet
Open Source
Real Time Charts
Jito Mev Protection

Pricing compared

Both tools are free to use — costs come from network or usage fees.

BullX

BullX

Free to use (~1% per trade)

Free

  • Telegram + web terminal
  • TradingView charts
  • Copy trading
  • Security scanner
  • Multi-wallet
  • 5 chains
Get Started

Photon

Photon

Free to use (0.85–1% per trade)

Free

  • Solana only
  • Sub-second chart updates
  • Jito MEV protection
  • Limit/TP/SL orders
  • Copy trading
  • Multi-wallet
Get Started

Which should you choose?

Choose BullX if…

  • Only major bot with both Telegram interface and full TradingView web terminal
  • Security scanner flags honeypots and rugs before execution — reduces scam losses
  • Multi-wallet management allows separating trading wallets by strategy

Watch out: ~1% trade fee is higher than Banana Gun (0.5%) — meaningful for high volume traders.

Choose Photon if…

  • Fastest Solana web trading UI — sub-second chart updates outpace browser-based competition
  • Jito bundle MEV protection reduces front-running losses on Solana
  • Browser-based — no Telegram required, works on any device with a browser

Watch out: Solana-only — no EVM chain support.

Our verdict

BullX edges ahead on our editorial score (4.4/5), but these tools aren’t straight substitutes. Pick BullX when only major bot with both telegram interface and full tradingview web terminal matters most to your workflow; pick Photon when fastest solana web trading ui — sub-second chart updates outpace browser-based competition is the priority. The deciding factor is usually the trade-off you can least afford — BullX means accepting that ~1% trade fee is higher than banana gun (0.5%) — meaningful for high volume traders, while Photon means solana-only — no evm chain support.

Frequently asked questions

Is BullX or Photon better?

BullX carries the higher editorial rating (4.4/5 vs 4.3/5), but they solve different problems. BullX is the stronger pick when you need only major bot with both telegram interface and full tradingview web terminal. Photon wins when fastest solana web trading ui — sub-second chart updates outpace browser-based competition.

Which is cheaper, BullX or Photon?

Both tools are free to use, with costs coming from network or usage fees rather than subscriptions.

What are the main drawbacks of BullX and Photon?

BullX's main limitation is that ~1% trade fee is higher than banana gun (0.5%) — meaningful for high volume traders. For Photon, solana-only — no evm chain support. Weigh these against how you actually plan to use the tool.

Can you use BullX and Photon together?

In most cases yes — many teams run both, using each where it's strongest. Since BullX leads on only major bot with both telegram interface and full tradingview web terminal and Photon on fastest solana web trading ui — sub-second chart updates outpace browser-based competition, the two are often complementary rather than mutually exclusive.