Certora vs Dedaub
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Certora and Dedaub — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Certora
Formal verification platform proving smart-contract correctness mathematically
Certora is a specialist in formal verification — mathematically proving that smart contracts behave according to specified rules, rather than just testing for known bug patterns. Its Certora Prover le…
Full review →Dedaub
Security firm with elite static-analysis and decompilation tooling
Dedaub is a smart-contract security firm distinguished by its exceptional static-analysis and decompilation technology, born from academic research into program analysis. Its auditors are backed by pr…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Certora | Dedaub |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✗ | ✗ |
| Contract Library | ✗ | ✗ |
| Formal Verification | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✗ | ✗ |
Certora Pricing
Certora
Platform + Services
Custom
- ✓Certora Prover platform
- ✓Formal verification of invariants
- ✓Spec-writing expert services
- ✓Used by Aave, Compound
- ✓Quote-based
Dedaub Pricing
Dedaub
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Manual audits + heavy static analysis
- ✓EVM decompilation tooling
- ✓Watchdog real-time monitoring
- ✓Complex-system expertise
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Certora is the better pick if you need mathematically proves correctness, not just testing. Dedaub wins when elite static-analysis and decompilation tech. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.