Chainstack vs Grove
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Chainstack and Grove — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Chainstack
Managed node infrastructure with predictable pricing and global reach
Chainstack is a managed blockchain infrastructure provider offering RPC nodes across many protocols, well-regarded for predictable pricing, strong performance, and a developer-friendly platform, frequ…
Full review →Grove
Managed RPC gateway built on Pocket Network's decentralized node supply
Grove is a managed RPC gateway operated by the Pocket Network team, giving builders the resilience of Pocket's decentralized node supply without the complexity of interacting with the decentralized pr…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Chainstack | Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Apis | ✓ | ✗ |
| Webhook Notifications | ✗ | ✗ |
| Archive Node Access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Account Abstraction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Sdk Available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi Chain Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated Nodes | ✓ | ✗ |
| Websocket Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Debug Trace Api | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mev Protection | ✗ | ✗ |
Chainstack Pricing
Chainstack
Growth
$49/mo
$490/yr billed annually
- ✓Higher request limits
- ✓Trace/debug APIs
- ✓Better performance
Chainstack
Scale
$199/mo
$1990/yr billed annually
- ✓Dedicated nodes
- ✓Archive access
- ✓Global deployment
Grove Pricing
Grove
Free
Free
- ✓Managed decentralized RPC
- ✓Pocket node supply
- ✓Many chains
- ✓Per-request pricing
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Chainstack is the better pick if you need predictable, transparent request-based pricing. Grove wins when decentralized resilience with managed ease. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.