A head-to-head comparison of CoinGlass and CryptoQuant — pricing, the features that actually differ, and which one fits which use case.
The go-to dashboard for crypto derivatives data — open interest, funding, liquidations
On-chain and market data platform for exchange flows and market signals
These are the 1 capabilities where the two tools genuinely diverge — the rest of their feature sets overlap.
| Capability | CoinGlass | CryptoQuant |
|---|---|---|
| Dex On Chain Data | No | Yes |
| Feature | CoinGlass | CryptoQuant |
|---|---|---|
| Price Data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Historical O H L C V | ✓ | ✓ |
| Exchange Data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Defi Tvl | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dex On Chain Data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Nft Data | ✗ | ✗ |
| Derivatives Data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Exchange Trust Score | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free Access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Api Stability | ✓ | ✓ |
CoinGlass has the lower entry price of the two.
CoinGlass
Free
CoinGlass
$29/mo
$290/yr billed annually
CoinGlass
$79/mo
$790/yr billed annually
CryptoQuant
Free
CryptoQuant
$39/mo
$390/yr billed annually
CryptoQuant
$99/mo
$990/yr billed annually
Watch out: Derivatives metrics are easily over-interpreted.
Watch out: On-chain signals are correlational, not certainties.
CoinGlass edges ahead on our editorial score (4.3/5), but these tools aren’t straight substitutes. Pick CoinGlass when canonical source for derivatives market data matters most to your workflow; pick CryptoQuant when signature exchange inflow/outflow metrics is the priority. The deciding factor is usually the trade-off you can least afford — CoinGlass means accepting that derivatives metrics are easily over-interpreted, while CryptoQuant means on-chain signals are correlational, not certainties.
CoinGlass carries the higher editorial rating (4.3/5 vs 4.2/5), but they solve different problems. CoinGlass is the stronger pick when you need canonical source for derivatives market data. CryptoQuant wins when signature exchange inflow/outflow metrics.
CoinGlass starts lower, at $29/month versus $39/month. Both also offer a free tier.
CoinGlass's main limitation is that derivatives metrics are easily over-interpreted. For CryptoQuant, on-chain signals are correlational, not certainties. Weigh these against how you actually plan to use the tool.
In most cases yes — many teams run both, using each where it's strongest. Since CoinGlass leads on canonical source for derivatives market data and CryptoQuant on signature exchange inflow/outflow metrics, the two are often complementary rather than mutually exclusive.