ChainPick

Consensys Diligence vs Certora

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Consensys Diligence and Certora — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

C

Consensys Diligence

Ethereum-native audit team from the company behind MetaMask and Infura

4.7(176)

Consensys Diligence is the smart-contract auditing arm of Consensys, the company behind MetaMask, Infura, and Linea, giving it deep, native Ethereum expertise and a long track record auditing major De

Full review →
C

Certora

Formal verification platform proving smart-contract correctness mathematically

4.6(94)

Certora is a specialist in formal verification — mathematically proving that smart contracts behave according to specified rules, rather than just testing for known bug patterns. Its Certora Prover le

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureConsensys DiligenceCertora
Manual Audit
Automated Scanning
Continuous Monitoring
Upgrade Management
Multi Sig Governance
Public Reports
Emergency Response
Contract Library
Formal Verification
Bug Bounty Management

Consensys Diligence Pricing

Consensys Diligence

Audit Engagement

Custom

  • Manual EVM smart-contract audits
  • MythX + Scribble tooling
  • DeFi + infrastructure expertise
  • Public reports
  • Quote-based engagements
Contact Sales

Certora Pricing

Certora

Platform + Services

Custom

  • Certora Prover platform
  • Formal verification of invariants
  • Spec-writing expert services
  • Used by Aave, Compound
  • Quote-based
Contact Sales

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Consensys Diligence is the better pick if you need first-party ethereum pedigree via consensys. Certora wins when mathematically proves correctness, not just testing. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.