ChainPick

Consensys Diligence vs Sherlock

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Consensys Diligence and Sherlock — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

C

Consensys Diligence

Ethereum-native audit team from the company behind MetaMask and Infura

4.7(176)

Consensys Diligence is the smart-contract auditing arm of Consensys, the company behind MetaMask, Infura, and Linea, giving it deep, native Ethereum expertise and a long track record auditing major De

Full review →
S

Sherlock

Audit contests plus smart-contract coverage backed by a researcher network

4.6(143)

Sherlock takes a distinctive approach to audits: rather than assigning a fixed in-house team, it builds each engagement from an 11,000+ researcher network, using performance data to match proven speci

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureConsensys DiligenceSherlock
Manual Audit
Automated Scanning
Continuous Monitoring
Upgrade Management
Multi Sig Governance
Public Reports
Emergency Response
Contract Library
Formal Verification
Bug Bounty Management

Consensys Diligence Pricing

Consensys Diligence

Audit Engagement

Custom

  • Manual EVM smart-contract audits
  • MythX + Scribble tooling
  • DeFi + infrastructure expertise
  • Public reports
  • Quote-based engagements
Contact Sales

Sherlock Pricing

Sherlock

Audit Contest + Coverage

Custom

  • Contest-based audits
  • 11,000+ researcher network
  • Optional smart-contract coverage
  • Performance-matched specialists
  • Quote-based
Contact Sales

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Consensys Diligence is the better pick if you need first-party ethereum pedigree via consensys. Sherlock wins when taps an 11,000+ competitive researcher network. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.