Cyfrin vs Dedaub
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Cyfrin and Dedaub — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Cyfrin
EVM audit depth plus a huge security-education and tooling ecosystem
Cyfrin combines private smart-contract audits with one of the largest security-education and tooling ecosystems in Web3, including the popular Cyfrin Updraft learning platform and the CodeHawks compet…
Full review →Dedaub
Security firm with elite static-analysis and decompilation tooling
Dedaub is a smart-contract security firm distinguished by its exceptional static-analysis and decompilation technology, born from academic research into program analysis. Its auditors are backed by pr…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cyfrin | Dedaub |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✗ | ✓ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✓ | ✗ |
| Contract Library | ✓ | ✗ |
| Formal Verification | ✗ | ✓ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✓ | ✗ |
Cyfrin Pricing
Cyfrin
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Private EVM smart-contract audits
- ✓CodeHawks contest marketplace
- ✓Security tooling + education ecosystem
- ✓Public reports
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Dedaub Pricing
Dedaub
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Manual audits + heavy static analysis
- ✓EVM decompilation tooling
- ✓Watchdog real-time monitoring
- ✓Complex-system expertise
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Cyfrin is the better pick if you need strong evm private-audit depth. Dedaub wins when elite static-analysis and decompilation tech. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.