A head-to-head comparison of DeBank and Rotki — pricing, the features that actually differ, and which one fits which use case.
The fastest-updating DeFi portfolio tracker with a built-in social layer
Open-source, local-first portfolio tracker and tax tool that keeps your data private
These are the 3 capabilities where the two tools genuinely diverge — the rest of their feature sets overlap.
| Capability | DeBank | Rotki |
|---|---|---|
| No Account Required | Yes | No |
| Lending Health Ratio | Yes | No |
| Social Wallet Feed | Yes | No |
| Feature | DeBank | Rotki |
|---|---|---|
| Multi Chain Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| No Account Required | ✓ | ✗ |
| Lp Position Tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Impermanent Loss Estimate | ✗ | ✗ |
| Lending Health Ratio | ✓ | ✗ |
| Nft Tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| In App Swap | ✗ | ✗ |
| Social Wallet Feed | ✓ | ✗ |
| Historical Activity | ✓ | ✓ |
| Portfolio Alerts | ✗ | ✗ |
Both tools are free to use — costs come from network or usage fees.
DeBank
Custom
$99/yr billed annually
Rotki
Free
Rotki
$27/mo
$270/yr billed annually
Rotki
$55/mo
$550/yr billed annually
Watch out: No impermanent loss estimates — Zapper is better for LP tracking.
Watch out: Runs locally, so you manage installation and updates yourself.
DeBank edges ahead on our editorial score (4.6/5), but these tools aren’t straight substitutes. Pick DeBank when fastest protocol and chain additions — usually first to support new networks matters most to your workflow; pick Rotki when fully open-source and local-first — your data never leaves your machine is the priority. The deciding factor is usually the trade-off you can least afford — DeBank means accepting that no impermanent loss estimates — zapper is better for lp tracking, while Rotki means runs locally, so you manage installation and updates yourself.
DeBank carries the higher editorial rating (4.6/5 vs 4.5/5), but they solve different problems. DeBank is the stronger pick when you need fastest protocol and chain additions — usually first to support new networks. Rotki wins when fully open-source and local-first — your data never leaves your machine.
Both tools are free to use, with costs coming from network or usage fees rather than subscriptions.
DeBank's main limitation is that no impermanent loss estimates — zapper is better for lp tracking. For Rotki, runs locally, so you manage installation and updates yourself. Weigh these against how you actually plan to use the tool.
In most cases yes — many teams run both, using each where it's strongest. Since DeBank leads on fastest protocol and chain additions — usually first to support new networks and Rotki on fully open-source and local-first — your data never leaves your machine, the two are often complementary rather than mutually exclusive.