ChainPick

DefiLlama vs DappRadar (2026)

A head-to-head comparison of DefiLlama and DappRadar — pricing, the features that actually differ, and which one fits which use case.

At a glance

D

DefiLlama

The largest free DeFi TVL tracker — open source, ad-free, covering 250 chains and 3,500 protocols

4.7(5,840)
Starting price
Free
Free plan
Yes
Best for
Completely free and open source — no paywall for any TVL or revenue data
Full DefiLlama review →
D

DappRadar

The largest dapp discovery and analytics platform tracking usage across chains

4.1(168)
Starting price
$50/mo
Free plan
Yes
Best for
Largest dapp discovery and analytics platform
Full DappRadar review →

Where DefiLlama and DappRadar differ

These are the 7 capabilities where the two tools genuinely diverge — the rest of their feature sets overlap.

CapabilityDefiLlamaDappRadar
No Code BuilderYesNo
Realtime AlertsNoYes
Embed ChartsNoYes
Tvl TrackingYes
Revenue TrackingYes
Yields AggregatorYes
Open SourceYes

Full feature comparison

FeatureDefiLlamaDappRadar
Sql Interface
No Code Builder
Multi Chain Support
Realtime Alerts
Api Access
Embed Charts
Tvl Tracking
Revenue Tracking
Yields Aggregator
Open Source
Private Queries
Team Collaboration
Decoded Contracts
Python Notebooks

Pricing compared

Both tools are free to use — costs come from network or usage fees.

DefiLlama

DefiLlama

Free

Free

  • 3,500+ protocols
  • 250 chains
  • TVL + revenue + fees
  • DEX volumes
  • Yields aggregator
  • API access
  • Open source
Get Started

DappRadar

DappRadar

Free

Free

  • Dapp rankings + discovery
  • Usage/user/volume data
  • Portfolio tracking
  • Many chains
Get Started
Popular

DappRadar

Pro

$50/mo

$500/yr billed annually

  • Advanced analytics
  • More history
  • Alerts
  • Pro dashboards
Get Started

DappRadar

Team / Enterprise

Custom

  • API access
  • Custom data
  • Enterprise support
Contact Sales

Which should you choose?

Choose DefiLlama if…

  • Completely free and open source — no paywall for any TVL or revenue data
  • Most comprehensive protocol coverage — 3,500 protocols across 250 chains
  • Yields aggregator across 3,000+ opportunities saves hours of manual APY research

Watch out: No real-time alerts or notification system.

Choose DappRadar if…

  • Largest dapp discovery and analytics platform
  • Cross-chain usage, user, and volume rankings
  • Discover trending dApps, games, protocols

Watch out: Usage metrics gameable by airdrop farming.

Our verdict

DefiLlama edges ahead on our editorial score (4.7/5), but these tools aren’t straight substitutes. Pick DefiLlama when completely free and open source — no paywall for any tvl or revenue data matters most to your workflow; pick DappRadar when largest dapp discovery and analytics platform is the priority. The deciding factor is usually the trade-off you can least afford — DefiLlama means accepting that no real-time alerts or notification system, while DappRadar means usage metrics gameable by airdrop farming.

Frequently asked questions

Is DefiLlama or DappRadar better?

DefiLlama carries the higher editorial rating (4.7/5 vs 4.1/5), but they solve different problems. DefiLlama is the stronger pick when you need completely free and open source — no paywall for any tvl or revenue data. DappRadar wins when largest dapp discovery and analytics platform.

Which is cheaper, DefiLlama or DappRadar?

Both tools are free to use, with costs coming from network or usage fees rather than subscriptions.

What are the main drawbacks of DefiLlama and DappRadar?

DefiLlama's main limitation is that no real-time alerts or notification system. For DappRadar, usage metrics gameable by airdrop farming. Weigh these against how you actually plan to use the tool.

Can you use DefiLlama and DappRadar together?

In most cases yes — many teams run both, using each where it's strongest. Since DefiLlama leads on completely free and open source — no paywall for any tvl or revenue data and DappRadar on largest dapp discovery and analytics platform, the two are often complementary rather than mutually exclusive.