ChainPick

Ether.fi vs Babylon

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Ether.fi and Babylon — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

E

Ether.fi

Leading Ethereum liquid restaking protocol with non-custodial key control

4.5(176)

Ether.fi is one of the leading Ethereum liquid restaking protocols, letting users stake ETH to receive eETH — a liquid token that earns both Ethereum staking rewards and additional restaking rewards v

Full review →
B

Babylon

Bitcoin staking protocol securing PoS chains with native BTC

4.1(93)

Babylon is a pioneering Bitcoin staking protocol that lets holders stake native BTC — without bridging or wrapping it — to provide security to proof-of-stake chains and earn rewards, unlocking Bitcoin

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureEther.fiBabylon
Liquid TokeneETH / weETHNative BTC (+ LST partners)
Minimum StakeNoneNone
Reward FrequencyContinuousContinuous
Defi Compatible
Node Operator ModelDecentralized, key-retainingBTC self-custodial staking
Governance Token
Multi Chain
Slashing Protection
Withdrawal Enabled
Insurance Fund
Non Evm Support

Ether.fi Pricing

Ether.fi

Free (protocol fee on rewards)

Free

  • Liquid restaking (eETH)
  • ETH staking + EigenLayer rewards
  • Non-custodial key control
  • Wide DeFi integration
  • Own token + cash product
Get Started

Babylon Pricing

Babylon

Free (rewards vary)

Free

  • Native BTC staking (no wrapping)
  • Self-custodial via Bitcoin script
  • Secures PoS chains
  • LST ecosystem on top
  • Trustless slashing design
Get Started

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Ether.fi is the better pick if you need leading liquid restaking protocol by tvl. Babylon wins when stake native btc without wrapping or bridging. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.