ChainPick

Grove vs Allnodes

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Grove and Allnodes — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

G

Grove

Managed RPC gateway built on Pocket Network's decentralized node supply

4.2(79)

Grove is a managed RPC gateway operated by the Pocket Network team, giving builders the resilience of Pocket's decentralized node supply without the complexity of interacting with the decentralized pr

Full review →
A

Allnodes

Non-custodial node hosting and staking across many networks

4.2(114)

Allnodes is a node-hosting and staking platform that lets users deploy and manage full nodes, validator nodes, and RPC endpoints across many blockchains in a non-custodial way, popular with stakers an

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureGroveAllnodes
Enhanced Apis
Webhook Notifications
Archive Node Access
Account Abstraction
Sdk Available
Multi Chain Support
Dedicated Nodes
Websocket Support
Debug Trace Api
Mev Protection

Grove Pricing

Grove

Free

Free

  • Managed decentralized RPC
  • Pocket node supply
  • Many chains
  • Per-request pricing
Get Started
Popular

Grove

Growth

Free

  • Higher limits
  • Dashboards
  • Better performance
Get Started

Grove

Scale

$49/mo

$490/yr billed annually

  • Archive access
  • Priority routing
  • Support
Get Started

Grove

Enterprise

Custom

  • Custom SLA
  • Enterprise gateway
  • Dedicated support
Contact Sales

Allnodes Pricing

Allnodes

Per-node hosting

$5/mo

$50/yr billed annually

  • Non-custodial node hosting
  • Many networks
  • Monitoring
  • Transparent per-node pricing
Get Started

Allnodes

Validator / Dedicated

Custom

  • Validator node hosting
  • Staking services
  • Dedicated RPC
  • Priority support
Contact Sales

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Grove is the better pick if you need decentralized resilience with managed ease. Allnodes wins when non-custodial node and validator hosting. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.