Grove vs Tatum
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Grove and Tatum — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Grove
Managed RPC gateway built on Pocket Network's decentralized node supply
Grove is a managed RPC gateway operated by the Pocket Network team, giving builders the resilience of Pocket's decentralized node supply without the complexity of interacting with the decentralized pr…
Full review →Tatum
Unified Web3 development platform and RPC across 100+ chains
Tatum is a Web3 development platform that combines RPC node access across 100+ blockchains with a unified SDK and higher-level APIs designed to speed up building — abstracting the differences between …
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grove | Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Apis | ✗ | ✓ |
| Webhook Notifications | ✗ | ✓ |
| Archive Node Access | ✓ | ✗ |
| Account Abstraction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Sdk Available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi Chain Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated Nodes | ✗ | ✗ |
| Websocket Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Debug Trace Api | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mev Protection | ✗ | ✗ |
Grove Pricing
Grove
Free
Free
- ✓Managed decentralized RPC
- ✓Pocket node supply
- ✓Many chains
- ✓Per-request pricing
Tatum Pricing
Tatum
Growth
$49/mo
$490/yr billed annually
- ✓Higher limits
- ✓More API calls
- ✓Notifications
Tatum
Scale
$199/mo
$1990/yr billed annually
- ✓Dedicated performance
- ✓Advanced APIs
- ✓Priority support
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Grove is the better pick if you need decentralized resilience with managed ease. Tatum wins when unified sdk/api across 100+ chains. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.