Hacken vs Cyfrin
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Hacken and Cyfrin — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Hacken
Full-stack Web3 security firm spanning audits, pentesting, and compliance
Hacken is a full-stack Web3 cybersecurity firm offering smart-contract audits alongside a broader security suite: penetration testing, blockchain protocol analysis, proof-of-reserves, and regulatory/c…
Full review →Cyfrin
EVM audit depth plus a huge security-education and tooling ecosystem
Cyfrin combines private smart-contract audits with one of the largest security-education and tooling ecosystems in Web3, including the popular Cyfrin Updraft learning platform and the CodeHawks compet…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Hacken | Cyfrin |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✓ | ✗ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✓ | ✓ |
| Contract Library | ✗ | ✓ |
| Formal Verification | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✓ | ✓ |
Hacken Pricing
Hacken
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Smart-contract audits
- ✓Penetration testing
- ✓Proof-of-reserves + CEX audits
- ✓Compliance services
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Cyfrin Pricing
Cyfrin
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Private EVM smart-contract audits
- ✓CodeHawks contest marketplace
- ✓Security tooling + education ecosystem
- ✓Public reports
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Hacken is the better pick if you need full-stack security beyond just contract audits. Cyfrin wins when strong evm private-audit depth. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.