Hacken vs Dedaub
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Hacken and Dedaub — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Hacken
Full-stack Web3 security firm spanning audits, pentesting, and compliance
Hacken is a full-stack Web3 cybersecurity firm offering smart-contract audits alongside a broader security suite: penetration testing, blockchain protocol analysis, proof-of-reserves, and regulatory/c…
Full review →Dedaub
Security firm with elite static-analysis and decompilation tooling
Dedaub is a smart-contract security firm distinguished by its exceptional static-analysis and decompilation technology, born from academic research into program analysis. Its auditors are backed by pr…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Hacken | Dedaub |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✓ | ✗ |
| Contract Library | ✗ | ✗ |
| Formal Verification | ✗ | ✓ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✓ | ✗ |
Hacken Pricing
Hacken
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Smart-contract audits
- ✓Penetration testing
- ✓Proof-of-reserves + CEX audits
- ✓Compliance services
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Dedaub Pricing
Dedaub
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Manual audits + heavy static analysis
- ✓EVM decompilation tooling
- ✓Watchdog real-time monitoring
- ✓Complex-system expertise
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Hacken is the better pick if you need full-stack security beyond just contract audits. Dedaub wins when elite static-analysis and decompilation tech. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.