Hacken vs PeckShield
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Hacken and PeckShield — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Hacken
Full-stack Web3 security firm spanning audits, pentesting, and compliance
Hacken is a full-stack Web3 cybersecurity firm offering smart-contract audits alongside a broader security suite: penetration testing, blockchain protocol analysis, proof-of-reserves, and regulatory/c…
Full review →PeckShield
Prolific security firm known for audits and rapid exploit analysis
PeckShield is a well-known blockchain security company that combines a large volume of smart-contract audits with a high-profile presence in exploit detection and post-mortem analysis — its alerts abo…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Hacken | PeckShield |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✓ | ✓ |
| Contract Library | ✗ | ✗ |
| Formal Verification | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✓ | ✗ |
Hacken Pricing
Hacken
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Smart-contract audits
- ✓Penetration testing
- ✓Proof-of-reserves + CEX audits
- ✓Compliance services
- ✓Quote-based engagements
PeckShield Pricing
PeckShield
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Smart-contract audits
- ✓Exploit detection + monitoring
- ✓Post-mortem analysis
- ✓Security analytics
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Hacken is the better pick if you need full-stack security beyond just contract audits. PeckShield wins when prolific auditor with a long track record. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.