Infura vs Allnodes
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Infura and Allnodes — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Infura
The original managed Ethereum node provider — battle-tested at massive scale
Infura is the oldest and most widely recognized managed Ethereum node provider, operated by Consensys. It's been the backbone of MetaMask's default RPC endpoints since 2016, which means Infura has han…
Full review →Allnodes
Non-custodial node hosting and staking across many networks
Allnodes is a node-hosting and staking platform that lets users deploy and manage full nodes, validator nodes, and RPC endpoints across many blockchains in a non-custodial way, popular with stakers an…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Infura | Allnodes |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Apis | ✗ | ✗ |
| Webhook Notifications | ✗ | ✗ |
| Archive Node Access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Account Abstraction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Sdk Available | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi Chain Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated Nodes | Growth+ | ✓ |
| Websocket Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Debug Trace Api | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mev Protection | ✗ | ✗ |
Infura Pricing
Infura
Developer
$50/mo
- ✓5M requests/day
- ✓Archive data
- ✓WebSocket support
- ✓Email support
Allnodes Pricing
Allnodes
Per-node hosting
$5/mo
$50/yr billed annually
- ✓Non-custodial node hosting
- ✓Many networks
- ✓Monitoring
- ✓Transparent per-node pricing
Allnodes
Validator / Dedicated
Custom
- ✓Validator node hosting
- ✓Staking services
- ✓Dedicated RPC
- ✓Priority support
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Infura is the better pick if you need longest track record in managed ethereum nodes — deep institutional trust. Allnodes wins when non-custodial node and validator hosting. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.