Infura vs Chainstack
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Infura and Chainstack — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Infura
The original managed Ethereum node provider — battle-tested at massive scale
Infura is the oldest and most widely recognized managed Ethereum node provider, operated by Consensys. It's been the backbone of MetaMask's default RPC endpoints since 2016, which means Infura has han…
Full review →Chainstack
Managed node infrastructure with predictable pricing and global reach
Chainstack is a managed blockchain infrastructure provider offering RPC nodes across many protocols, well-regarded for predictable pricing, strong performance, and a developer-friendly platform, frequ…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Infura | Chainstack |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Apis | ✗ | ✓ |
| Webhook Notifications | ✗ | ✗ |
| Archive Node Access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Account Abstraction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Sdk Available | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi Chain Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated Nodes | Growth+ | ✓ |
| Websocket Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Debug Trace Api | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mev Protection | ✗ | ✗ |
Infura Pricing
Infura
Developer
$50/mo
- ✓5M requests/day
- ✓Archive data
- ✓WebSocket support
- ✓Email support
Chainstack Pricing
Chainstack
Growth
$49/mo
$490/yr billed annually
- ✓Higher request limits
- ✓Trace/debug APIs
- ✓Better performance
Chainstack
Scale
$199/mo
$1990/yr billed annually
- ✓Dedicated nodes
- ✓Archive access
- ✓Global deployment
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Infura is the better pick if you need longest track record in managed ethereum nodes — deep institutional trust. Chainstack wins when predictable, transparent request-based pricing. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.