Infura vs Tatum
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Infura and Tatum — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Infura
The original managed Ethereum node provider — battle-tested at massive scale
Infura is the oldest and most widely recognized managed Ethereum node provider, operated by Consensys. It's been the backbone of MetaMask's default RPC endpoints since 2016, which means Infura has han…
Full review →Tatum
Unified Web3 development platform and RPC across 100+ chains
Tatum is a Web3 development platform that combines RPC node access across 100+ blockchains with a unified SDK and higher-level APIs designed to speed up building — abstracting the differences between …
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Infura | Tatum |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Apis | ✗ | ✓ |
| Webhook Notifications | ✗ | ✓ |
| Archive Node Access | ✓ | ✗ |
| Account Abstraction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Sdk Available | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi Chain Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated Nodes | Growth+ | ✗ |
| Websocket Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Debug Trace Api | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mev Protection | ✗ | ✗ |
Infura Pricing
Infura
Developer
$50/mo
- ✓5M requests/day
- ✓Archive data
- ✓WebSocket support
- ✓Email support
Tatum Pricing
Tatum
Growth
$49/mo
$490/yr billed annually
- ✓Higher limits
- ✓More API calls
- ✓Notifications
Tatum
Scale
$199/mo
$1990/yr billed annually
- ✓Dedicated performance
- ✓Advanced APIs
- ✓Priority support
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Infura is the better pick if you need longest track record in managed ethereum nodes — deep institutional trust. Tatum wins when unified sdk/api across 100+ chains. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.