ChainPick

MetaMask vs Frame

A detailed head-to-head comparison of MetaMask and Frame — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

M

MetaMask

The most widely used self-custody browser wallet for EVM chains

4.2(2,341)

MetaMask is the default entry point into Web3 for the vast majority of users — a browser extension and mobile app that gives you a self-custody Ethereum wallet without running a full node. It connects

Full review →
F

Frame

Privacy-focused desktop-native wallet for power users and hardware wallets

4.0(86)

Frame is a privacy-focused, desktop-native Ethereum wallet designed for power users, distinctive for running as a system-wide desktop application that can connect to any dApp in any browser while prov

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureMetaMaskFrame
Self Custody
Hardware Wallet Support
Evm Chains
Non Evm ChainsVia Snaps
Mobile App
Browser Extension
In App Swap
Nft Support
Snaps Extensibility
Multi Sig

MetaMask Pricing

MetaMask

Free

Free

  • All EVM chains
  • Hardware wallet support
  • MetaMask Snaps
  • In-app swap (0.875% fee)
  • NFT support
Get Started

MetaMask

MetaMask Institutional

Custom

  • MPC custody
  • Multi-approver workflows
  • DeFi integrations
  • Audit trail
  • Compliance reporting
Contact Sales

Frame Pricing

Frame

Free

Free

  • Desktop-native wallet
  • Connects to any browser/tool
  • Strong hardware-wallet support
  • Custom RPC + privacy controls
  • Open-source
Get Started

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

MetaMask is the better pick if you need universal dapp compatibility — every evm dapp supports metamask first. Frame wins when desktop-native — works with any browser or tool. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.