A head-to-head comparison of MetaMask and Solflare — pricing, the features that actually differ, and which one fits which use case.
The most widely used self-custody browser wallet for EVM chains
The staking-first Solana wallet with the deepest validator controls and Ledger integration
These are the 3 capabilities where the two tools genuinely diverge — the rest of their feature sets overlap.
| Capability | MetaMask | Solflare |
|---|---|---|
| Evm Chains | Yes | No |
| Non Evm Chains | Via Snaps | Yes |
| Snaps Extensibility | Yes | No |
| Feature | MetaMask | Solflare |
|---|---|---|
| Self Custody | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware Wallet Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Evm Chains | ✓ | ✗ |
| Non Evm Chains | Via Snaps | ✓ |
| Mobile App | ✓ | ✓ |
| Browser Extension | ✓ | ✓ |
| In App Swap | ✓ | ✓ |
| Nft Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Snaps Extensibility | ✓ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig | ✗ | ✗ |
Both tools are free to use — costs come from network or usage fees.
MetaMask
Free
MetaMask
Custom
Solflare
Free
Watch out: Default Infura RPC leaks your IP and wallet activity to Consensys — always set a custom RPC.
Watch out: Solana-only — no EVM or Bitcoin support unlike Phantom.
Solflare edges ahead on our editorial score (4.4/5), but these tools aren’t straight substitutes. Pick MetaMask when universal dapp compatibility — every evm dapp supports metamask first matters most to your workflow; pick Solflare when best staking ux on solana — direct validator selection with full performance data is the priority. The deciding factor is usually the trade-off you can least afford — MetaMask means accepting that default infura rpc leaks your ip and wallet activity to consensys — always set a custom rpc, while Solflare means solana-only — no evm or bitcoin support unlike phantom.
Solflare carries the higher editorial rating (4.4/5 vs 4.2/5), but they solve different problems. MetaMask is the stronger pick when you need universal dapp compatibility — every evm dapp supports metamask first. Solflare wins when best staking ux on solana — direct validator selection with full performance data.
Both tools are free to use, with costs coming from network or usage fees rather than subscriptions.
MetaMask's main limitation is that default infura rpc leaks your ip and wallet activity to consensys — always set a custom rpc. For Solflare, solana-only — no evm or bitcoin support unlike phantom. Weigh these against how you actually plan to use the tool.
In most cases yes — many teams run both, using each where it's strongest. Since MetaMask leads on universal dapp compatibility — every evm dapp supports metamask first and Solflare on best staking ux on solana — direct validator selection with full performance data, the two are often complementary rather than mutually exclusive.