ChainPick

MetaMask vs Xverse

A detailed head-to-head comparison of MetaMask and Xverse — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

M

MetaMask

The most widely used self-custody browser wallet for EVM chains

4.2(2,341)

MetaMask is the default entry point into Web3 for the vast majority of users — a browser extension and mobile app that gives you a self-custody Ethereum wallet without running a full node. It connects

Full review →
X

Xverse

The leading Bitcoin and Ordinals wallet with Stacks and BRC-20 support

4.3(128)

Xverse is a leading Bitcoin wallet, purpose-built for the Bitcoin ecosystem's newer frontiers — Ordinals (Bitcoin NFTs), BRC-20 and Runes tokens, and the Stacks layer for Bitcoin DeFi — filling a gap

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureMetaMaskXverse
Self Custody
Hardware Wallet Support
Evm Chains
Non Evm ChainsVia Snaps
Mobile App
Browser Extension
In App Swap
Nft Support
Snaps Extensibility
Multi Sig

MetaMask Pricing

MetaMask

Free

Free

  • All EVM chains
  • Hardware wallet support
  • MetaMask Snaps
  • In-app swap (0.875% fee)
  • NFT support
Get Started

MetaMask

MetaMask Institutional

Custom

  • MPC custody
  • Multi-approver workflows
  • DeFi integrations
  • Audit trail
  • Compliance reporting
Contact Sales

Xverse Pricing

Xverse

Free

Free

  • Bitcoin + Ordinals wallet
  • BRC-20 and Runes tokens
  • Stacks layer + Bitcoin DeFi
  • STX stacking for yield
  • Mobile + extension
Get Started

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

MetaMask is the better pick if you need universal dapp compatibility — every evm dapp supports metamask first. Xverse wins when leading bitcoin ordinals and tokens wallet. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.