⬡ChainPick

OKLink vs Arbiscan (2026)

A head-to-head comparison of OKLink and Arbiscan — pricing, the features that actually differ, and which one fits which use case.

At a glance

O

OKLink

Multi-chain block explorer from OKX covering 30+ chains including Bitcoin, Solana, and all EVM networks

4.2(1,240)
Starting price
$99/mo
Free plan
Yes
Best for
Single interface spanning 30+ chains — unique multi-chain search experience
Full OKLink review →
A

Arbiscan

The Etherscan-built block explorer for Arbitrum One and Nova

4.5(612)
Starting price
$19/mo
Free plan
Yes
Best for
Canonical, best-maintained explorer for Arbitrum
Full Arbiscan review →

Where OKLink and Arbiscan differ

These are the 4 capabilities where the two tools genuinely diverge — the rest of their feature sets overlap.

CapabilityOKLinkArbiscan
Contract VerificationNoYes
Multi Chain SupportYesNo
Source Code ViewerNoYes
Private NotesNoPro plans

Full feature comparison

FeatureOKLinkArbiscan
Transaction History✓✓
Contract Verification✗✓
Token Tracking✓✓
Nft Tracking✓✓
Api Access✓✓
Multi Chain Support✓✗
Gas Tracker✓✓
Source Code Viewer✗✓
Address Labels✓✓
Private Notes✗Pro plans

Pricing compared

Arbiscan has the lower entry price of the two.

OKLink

OKLink

Free

Free

  • ✓30+ chains
  • ✓Unified multi-chain search
  • ✓Bitcoin ordinals
  • ✓Whale tracking
  • ✓API access (rate limited)
Get Started

OKLink

Pro API

$99/mo

  • ✓Higher API limits
  • ✓Bulk endpoints
  • ✓Priority support
  • ✓Custom data feeds
Get Started

Arbiscan

Arbiscan

Free

Free

  • ✓Full explorer access
  • ✓Unified V2 API (5 calls/sec)
  • ✓Contract verification
  • ✓Token + gas tracking
Get Started
Popular

Arbiscan

Pro Starter

$19/mo

$190/yr billed annually

  • ✓10 calls/sec
  • ✓Address watchlist alerts
  • ✓Private notes
  • ✓Priority support
Get Started

Arbiscan

Pro Standard

$99/mo

$990/yr billed annually

  • ✓30 calls/sec
  • ✓Advanced monitoring
  • ✓CSV exports
  • ✓5 user seats
Get Started

Which should you choose?

Choose OKLink if…

  • ✓Single interface spanning 30+ chains — unique multi-chain search experience
  • ✓Bitcoin ordinals and BRC-20 inscription explorer is best-in-class
  • ✓Whale wallet tracking and TVL analytics go beyond basic transaction lookup

Watch out: No contract source code verification like Etherscan or BscScan.

Choose Arbiscan if…

  • ✓Canonical, best-maintained explorer for Arbitrum
  • ✓Full contract verification and read/write UI
  • ✓Traces L1↔L2 deposits, withdrawals, and messaging

Watch out: Closed-source and centrally operated.

Our verdict

Arbiscan edges ahead on our editorial score (4.5/5), but these tools aren’t straight substitutes. Pick OKLink when single interface spanning 30+ chains — unique multi-chain search experience matters most to your workflow; pick Arbiscan when canonical, best-maintained explorer for arbitrum is the priority. The deciding factor is usually the trade-off you can least afford — OKLink means accepting that no contract source code verification like etherscan or bscscan, while Arbiscan means closed-source and centrally operated.

Frequently asked questions

Is OKLink or Arbiscan better?

Arbiscan carries the higher editorial rating (4.5/5 vs 4.2/5), but they solve different problems. OKLink is the stronger pick when you need single interface spanning 30+ chains — unique multi-chain search experience. Arbiscan wins when canonical, best-maintained explorer for arbitrum.

Which is cheaper, OKLink or Arbiscan?

Arbiscan starts lower, at $19/month versus $99/month. Both also offer a free tier.

What are the main drawbacks of OKLink and Arbiscan?

OKLink's main limitation is that no contract source code verification like etherscan or bscscan. For Arbiscan, closed-source and centrally operated. Weigh these against how you actually plan to use the tool.

Can you use OKLink and Arbiscan together?

In most cases yes — many teams run both, using each where it's strongest. Since OKLink leads on single interface spanning 30+ chains — unique multi-chain search experience and Arbiscan on canonical, best-maintained explorer for arbitrum, the two are often complementary rather than mutually exclusive.