ChainPick

Quantstamp vs Consensys Diligence (2026)

A head-to-head comparison of Quantstamp and Consensys Diligence — pricing, the features that actually differ, and which one fits which use case.

At a glance

Q

Quantstamp

Veteran audit firm with 1,000+ audits and strong ongoing communication

4.5(198)
Starting price
On request
Free plan
No
Best for
1,000+ audits and a long track record
Full Quantstamp review →
C

Consensys Diligence

Ethereum-native audit team from the company behind MetaMask and Infura

4.7(176)
Starting price
On request
Free plan
No
Best for
First-party Ethereum pedigree via Consensys
Full Consensys Diligence review →

Where Quantstamp and Consensys Diligence differ

These are the 2 capabilities where the two tools genuinely diverge — the rest of their feature sets overlap.

CapabilityQuantstampConsensys Diligence
Continuous MonitoringYesNo
Formal VerificationNoYes

Full feature comparison

FeatureQuantstampConsensys Diligence
Manual Audit
Automated Scanning
Continuous Monitoring
Upgrade Management
Multi Sig Governance
Public Reports
Emergency Response
Contract Library
Formal Verification
Bug Bounty Management

Pricing compared

Pricing models differ substantially between these two.

Quantstamp

Quantstamp

Audit Engagement

Custom

  • Manual smart-contract audits
  • Protocol security reviews
  • Ongoing communication + incident tracking
  • Monitoring services
  • Quote-based engagements
Contact Sales

Consensys Diligence

Consensys Diligence

Audit Engagement

Custom

  • Manual EVM smart-contract audits
  • MythX + Scribble tooling
  • DeFi + infrastructure expertise
  • Public reports
  • Quote-based engagements
Contact Sales

Which should you choose?

Choose Quantstamp if…

  • 1,000+ audits and a long track record
  • Strong ongoing communication and reporting
  • Broad experience across protocol types

Watch out: Professional-end pricing.

Choose Consensys Diligence if…

  • First-party Ethereum pedigree via Consensys
  • Strong proprietary and open-source tooling
  • Audited major DeFi and infrastructure protocols

Watch out: Ethereum/EVM-focused, not multi-ecosystem.

Our verdict

Consensys Diligence edges ahead on our editorial score (4.7/5), but these tools aren’t straight substitutes. Pick Quantstamp when 1,000+ audits and a long track record matters most to your workflow; pick Consensys Diligence when first-party ethereum pedigree via consensys is the priority. The deciding factor is usually the trade-off you can least afford — Quantstamp means accepting that professional-end pricing, while Consensys Diligence means ethereum/evm-focused, not multi-ecosystem.

Frequently asked questions

Is Quantstamp or Consensys Diligence better?

Consensys Diligence carries the higher editorial rating (4.7/5 vs 4.5/5), but they solve different problems. Quantstamp is the stronger pick when you need 1,000+ audits and a long track record. Consensys Diligence wins when first-party ethereum pedigree via consensys.

Which is cheaper, Quantstamp or Consensys Diligence?

Both are priced on request — expect quote-based pricing rather than public tiers.

What are the main drawbacks of Quantstamp and Consensys Diligence?

Quantstamp's main limitation is that professional-end pricing. For Consensys Diligence, ethereum/evm-focused, not multi-ecosystem. Weigh these against how you actually plan to use the tool.

Can you use Quantstamp and Consensys Diligence together?

In most cases yes — many teams run both, using each where it's strongest. Since Quantstamp leads on 1,000+ audits and a long track record and Consensys Diligence on first-party ethereum pedigree via consensys, the two are often complementary rather than mutually exclusive.