Sherlock vs Code4rena
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Sherlock and Code4rena — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Sherlock
Audit contests plus smart-contract coverage backed by a researcher network
Sherlock takes a distinctive approach to audits: rather than assigning a fixed in-house team, it builds each engagement from an 11,000+ researcher network, using performance data to match proven speci…
Full review →Code4rena
Competitive audit platform crowdsourcing bug discovery through contests
Code4rena (C4) pioneered the competitive audit model, running time-boxed public and private audit contests where hundreds of independent 'Wardens' compete to find vulnerabilities in a codebase, with p…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Sherlock | Code4rena |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ | ✗ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✗ | ✗ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✓ | ✗ |
| Contract Library | ✗ | ✗ |
| Formal Verification | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✓ | ✓ |
Sherlock Pricing
Sherlock
Audit Contest + Coverage
Custom
- ✓Contest-based audits
- ✓11,000+ researcher network
- ✓Optional smart-contract coverage
- ✓Performance-matched specialists
- ✓Quote-based
Code4rena Pricing
Code4rena
Audit Contest
Custom
- ✓Competitive audit contests
- ✓Large 'Warden' researcher pool
- ✓Severity-based prize pools
- ✓Public + private contests
- ✓Prize-pool-based pricing
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Sherlock is the better pick if you need taps an 11,000+ competitive researcher network. Code4rena wins when pioneered the competitive audit model. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.