Sherlock vs Dedaub
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Sherlock and Dedaub — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Sherlock
Audit contests plus smart-contract coverage backed by a researcher network
Sherlock takes a distinctive approach to audits: rather than assigning a fixed in-house team, it builds each engagement from an 11,000+ researcher network, using performance data to match proven speci…
Full review →Dedaub
Security firm with elite static-analysis and decompilation tooling
Dedaub is a smart-contract security firm distinguished by its exceptional static-analysis and decompilation technology, born from academic research into program analysis. Its auditors are backed by pr…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Sherlock | Dedaub |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✗ | ✓ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✓ | ✗ |
| Contract Library | ✗ | ✗ |
| Formal Verification | ✗ | ✓ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✓ | ✗ |
Sherlock Pricing
Sherlock
Audit Contest + Coverage
Custom
- ✓Contest-based audits
- ✓11,000+ researcher network
- ✓Optional smart-contract coverage
- ✓Performance-matched specialists
- ✓Quote-based
Dedaub Pricing
Dedaub
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Manual audits + heavy static analysis
- ✓EVM decompilation tooling
- ✓Watchdog real-time monitoring
- ✓Complex-system expertise
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Sherlock is the better pick if you need taps an 11,000+ competitive researcher network. Dedaub wins when elite static-analysis and decompilation tech. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.