Sherlock vs Immunefi
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Sherlock and Immunefi — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Sherlock
Audit contests plus smart-contract coverage backed by a researcher network
Sherlock takes a distinctive approach to audits: rather than assigning a fixed in-house team, it builds each engagement from an 11,000+ researcher network, using performance data to match proven speci…
Full review →Immunefi
The largest bug bounty marketplace connecting protocols with whitehat hackers
Immunefi is the largest bug bounty platform in Web3, connecting protocols with a global community of whitehat hackers who are rewarded for responsibly disclosing vulnerabilities — often with the bigge…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Sherlock | Immunefi |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ | ✗ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ | ✗ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✗ | ✓ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✓ | ✓ |
| Contract Library | ✗ | ✗ |
| Formal Verification | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✓ | ✓ |
Sherlock Pricing
Sherlock
Audit Contest + Coverage
Custom
- ✓Contest-based audits
- ✓11,000+ researcher network
- ✓Optional smart-contract coverage
- ✓Performance-matched specialists
- ✓Quote-based
Immunefi Pricing
Immunefi
Bounty Program
Custom
- ✓Managed bug bounty programs
- ✓Largest whitehat hacker community
- ✓Severity-scaled payouts
- ✓Triage + validation handled
- ✓Project-funded bounties
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Sherlock is the better pick if you need taps an 11,000+ competitive researcher network. Immunefi wins when largest bug bounty marketplace in web3. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.