Sherlock vs Spearbit / Cantina
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Sherlock and Spearbit / Cantina — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Sherlock
Audit contests plus smart-contract coverage backed by a researcher network
Sherlock takes a distinctive approach to audits: rather than assigning a fixed in-house team, it builds each engagement from an 11,000+ researcher network, using performance data to match proven speci…
Full review →Spearbit / Cantina
Elite auditor collective matching top independent researchers to projects
Spearbit is a decentralized network of elite independent security researchers, and Cantina is its marketplace platform connecting projects with top-tier auditors for private engagements, competitions,…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Sherlock | Spearbit / Cantina |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✗ | ✗ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✓ | ✓ |
| Contract Library | ✗ | ✗ |
| Formal Verification | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✓ | ✓ |
Sherlock Pricing
Sherlock
Audit Contest + Coverage
Custom
- ✓Contest-based audits
- ✓11,000+ researcher network
- ✓Optional smart-contract coverage
- ✓Performance-matched specialists
- ✓Quote-based
Spearbit / Cantina Pricing
Spearbit / Cantina
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Bespoke elite-researcher teams
- ✓Cantina audit marketplace
- ✓Competitions + managed bug bounties
- ✓Specialist depth per codebase
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Sherlock is the better pick if you need taps an 11,000+ competitive researcher network. Spearbit / Cantina wins when access to elite individual researchers. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.