Sherlock vs Zellic
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Sherlock and Zellic — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Sherlock
Audit contests plus smart-contract coverage backed by a researcher network
Sherlock takes a distinctive approach to audits: rather than assigning a fixed in-house team, it builds each engagement from an 11,000+ researcher network, using performance data to match proven speci…
Full review →Zellic
Research-led security firm strong on novel protocols, ZK, and Rust
Zellic is a fast-rising, research-led security firm that has built a strong reputation for auditing cutting-edge and unconventional systems — novel DeFi protocols, zero-knowledge circuits, Rust-based …
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Sherlock | Zellic |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✗ | ✗ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✓ | ✓ |
| Contract Library | ✗ | ✗ |
| Formal Verification | ✗ | ✓ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✓ | ✗ |
Sherlock Pricing
Sherlock
Audit Contest + Coverage
Custom
- ✓Contest-based audits
- ✓11,000+ researcher network
- ✓Optional smart-contract coverage
- ✓Performance-matched specialists
- ✓Quote-based
Zellic Pricing
Zellic
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Manual audits (EVM + non-EVM)
- ✓Solana/Rust + ZK expertise
- ✓Novel protocol reviews
- ✓Technical public research
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Sherlock is the better pick if you need taps an 11,000+ competitive researcher network. Zellic wins when research-led, strong on novel/hard targets. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.