Subsquid (SQD) vs Covalent (GoldRush)
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Subsquid (SQD) and Covalent (GoldRush) — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Subsquid (SQD)
High-performance indexing across 225+ networks with fast historical backfill
Subsquid (SQD) is a high-performance blockchain indexing framework and decentralized data network providing access to data across 225+ networks — real-time, historical, and validated — used in product…
Full review →Covalent (GoldRush)
Unified multi-chain data API with the broadest chain coverage
Covalent (now delivered via its GoldRush developer platform) provides a unified, multi-chain data API covering one of the broadest sets of blockchains in the industry — 100+ networks — giving develope…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Subsquid (SQD) | Covalent (GoldRush) |
|---|---|---|
| Query Language | GraphQL / SQL | REST API |
| Decentralized | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi Chain | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom Subgraphs | ✓ | ✗ |
| Real Time Indexing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Historical Data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✗ |
| Streaming Data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Governance Token | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self Hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
Subsquid (SQD) Pricing
Subsquid (SQD)
Free (dev tier)
Free
- ✓Open-source framework
- ✓225+ networks
- ✓Fast historical backfill
- ✓TypeScript indexers
Subsquid (SQD)
Growth
$49/mo
$490/yr billed annually
- ✓Hosted service
- ✓Higher limits
- ✓Priority processing
Covalent (GoldRush) Pricing
Covalent (GoldRush)
Free (dev tier)
Free
- ✓Unified API, 100+ chains
- ✓Decoded on-chain data
- ✓Balances, tx, NFT data
- ✓Getting-started limits
Covalent (GoldRush)
Growth
$50/mo
$500/yr billed annually
- ✓Higher limits
- ✓More endpoints
- ✓Priority access
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Subsquid (SQD) is the better pick if you need 225+ networks, evm and non-evm. Covalent (GoldRush) wins when broadest multi-chain coverage (100+ networks). Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.