Wormhole vs deBridge
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Wormhole and deBridge — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Wormhole
Cross-chain messaging protocol connecting Solana, Ethereum, and 30+ chains with arbitrary data transfers
Wormhole is a cross-chain interoperability protocol that connects over 30 blockchains including Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Polygon, Avalanche, Fantom, Aptos, Sui, and Near — with particular strength…
Full review →deBridge
High-performance cross-chain infrastructure with $9B+ moved and zero exploits
deBridge is a high-performance cross-chain infrastructure protocol known for very fast transfers (often under a minute), a strong security record, and a design that avoids pooled liquidity risk. Rathe…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Wormhole | deBridge |
|---|---|---|
| Settlement Time | ~15–30 minutes | <1 min typical |
| Bridge Model | Guardian network attestation | Intent / solver network (DLN) |
| Fee Model | Gas only | Solver + protocol fee |
| Canonical Security | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cross Chain Messages | ✓ | ✓ |
| Governance Token | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi Chain | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self Custody | ✓ | ✓ |
| Arbitrary Messaging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Non Evm Support | ✓ | ✓ |
Wormhole Pricing
Wormhole
Free (gas costs only)
Free
- ✓30+ chains
- ✓Solana + EVM coverage
- ✓Portal token bridge
- ✓NTT framework
- ✓Developer SDK
deBridge Pricing
deBridge
Free (bridge fee only)
Free
- ✓Intent-based fast transfers
- ✓No pooled-liquidity honeypot
- ✓EVM + Solana support
- ✓deBridge DLN messaging
- ✓$9B+ moved, zero exploits
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Wormhole is the better pick if you need only major bridge with deep solana + evm interoperability in both directions. deBridge wins when very fast transfers, often under a minute. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.