ChainPick

Wormhole vs LI.FI

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Wormhole and LI.FI — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

W

Wormhole

Cross-chain messaging protocol connecting Solana, Ethereum, and 30+ chains with arbitrary data transfers

4.1(1,520)

Wormhole is a cross-chain interoperability protocol that connects over 30 blockchains including Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Polygon, Avalanche, Fantom, Aptos, Sui, and Near — with particular strength

Full review →
L

LI.FI

Bridge-and-DEX aggregation API routing across 50+ chains and many bridges

4.5(126)

LI.FI is a leading cross-chain aggregation protocol and API that routes transfers across 50+ chains by combining many underlying bridges (Across, Stargate, Hop, CCTP, and more) with DEX swaps, finding

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureWormholeLI.FI
Settlement Time~15–30 minutesVaries by route
Bridge ModelGuardian network attestationBridge + DEX aggregator
Fee ModelGas onlyBest-route + integrator fee
Canonical Security
Cross Chain Messages
Governance Token
Multi Chain
Self Custody
Arbitrary Messaging
Non Evm Support

Wormhole Pricing

Wormhole

Free (gas costs only)

Free

  • 30+ chains
  • Solana + EVM coverage
  • Portal token bridge
  • NTT framework
  • Developer SDK
Get Started

LI.FI Pricing

LI.FI

Free (routing fee)

Free

  • Aggregates 50+ chains + many bridges
  • Any-to-any routing with DEX swaps
  • Best-quote path finding
  • Powers Jumper + many apps
  • Developer API/SDK
Get Started

LI.FI

Enterprise

Custom

  • Higher limits
  • Custom integration support
  • SLA
  • Dedicated support
Contact Sales

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Wormhole is the better pick if you need only major bridge with deep solana + evm interoperability in both directions. LI.FI wins when aggregates 50+ chains and many bridges. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.