High-volume Web3 auditor with 1,400+ audits across many chains
Last updated: July 2026
QuillAudits is a high-volume Web3 security auditor that has completed 1,400+ audits, reviewed over a million lines of code, and secured several billion dollars in digital assets across a wide range of chains and project types. It positions itself as an accessible, established provider offering smart-contract audits, penetration testing, and security consulting, with experience spanning EVM chains and beyond. Its scale and volume mean broad familiarity with common vulnerability patterns and project archetypes, and it markets a relatively streamlined engagement process. QuillAudits also invests in security education and community content. The trade-offs: very high audit volume invites the usual debate about whether throughput comes at the expense of the depth boutique or contest-based reviewers bring to the hardest bugs, so matching the firm to your risk level matters; branding and marketing are prominent; and, as always, an audit is a point-in-time assurance, not a guarantee. But for projects wanting an established, experienced, reasonably accessible auditor with a large track record across many chains, QuillAudits is a widely-used option, particularly for teams that value a smooth process and broad chain coverage.
QuillAudits
Custom
| Feature | QuillAudits |
|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✓ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✓ |
| Contract Library | ✗ |
| Formal Verification | ✗ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✗ |
QuillAudits does not have a permanent free tier.
QuillAudits is used for high-volume web3 auditor with 1,400+ audits across many chains. It's primarily used by Web3 teams in the Smart Contract Auditors category.
See our full alternatives comparison at https://chainpick.io/alternatives/quillaudits.
QuillAudits has a rating of 4.3/5 based on 187 reviews. Key strength: 1,400+ audits and billions secured. Main limitation: High volume invites depth-vs-throughput debate.