Ether.fi vs Sanctum
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Ether.fi and Sanctum — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Ether.fi
Leading Ethereum liquid restaking protocol with non-custodial key control
Ether.fi is one of the leading Ethereum liquid restaking protocols, letting users stake ETH to receive eETH — a liquid token that earns both Ethereum staking rewards and additional restaking rewards v…
Full review →Sanctum
Solana liquid staking infrastructure and the Infinity multi-LST pool
Sanctum is Solana liquid staking infrastructure designed to unify the fragmented Solana LST landscape, best known for its Infinity pool and its mission to make all Solana liquid staking tokens interop…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Ether.fi | Sanctum |
|---|---|---|
| Liquid Token | eETH / weETH | INF + partner LSTs |
| Minimum Stake | None | None |
| Reward Frequency | Continuous | Continuous |
| Defi Compatible | ✓ | ✓ |
| Node Operator Model | Decentralized, key-retaining | Multi-LST aggregation |
| Governance Token | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi Chain | ✗ | ✗ |
| Slashing Protection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Withdrawal Enabled | ✓ | ✓ |
| Insurance Fund | ✗ | ✗ |
Ether.fi Pricing
Ether.fi
Free (protocol fee on rewards)
Free
- ✓Liquid restaking (eETH)
- ✓ETH staking + EigenLayer rewards
- ✓Non-custodial key control
- ✓Wide DeFi integration
- ✓Own token + cash product
Sanctum Pricing
Sanctum
Free (fee on rewards)
Free
- ✓Solana LST infrastructure
- ✓Infinity (INF) multi-LST pool
- ✓Instant unstaking Reserve
- ✓Launch your own LST
- ✓Unified LST liquidity
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Ether.fi is the better pick if you need leading liquid restaking protocol by tvl. Sanctum wins when unifies fragmented solana lst liquidity. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.