ChainPick

Sanctum vs Babylon

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Sanctum and Babylon — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.

S

Sanctum

Solana liquid staking infrastructure and the Infinity multi-LST pool

4.2(78)

Sanctum is Solana liquid staking infrastructure designed to unify the fragmented Solana LST landscape, best known for its Infinity pool and its mission to make all Solana liquid staking tokens interop

Full review →
B

Babylon

Bitcoin staking protocol securing PoS chains with native BTC

4.1(93)

Babylon is a pioneering Bitcoin staking protocol that lets holders stake native BTC — without bridging or wrapping it — to provide security to proof-of-stake chains and earn rewards, unlocking Bitcoin

Full review →

Feature Comparison

FeatureSanctumBabylon
Liquid TokenINF + partner LSTsNative BTC (+ LST partners)
Minimum StakeNoneNone
Reward FrequencyContinuousContinuous
Defi Compatible
Node Operator ModelMulti-LST aggregationBTC self-custodial staking
Governance Token
Multi Chain
Slashing Protection
Withdrawal Enabled
Insurance Fund
Non Evm Support

Sanctum Pricing

Sanctum

Free (fee on rewards)

Free

  • Solana LST infrastructure
  • Infinity (INF) multi-LST pool
  • Instant unstaking Reserve
  • Launch your own LST
  • Unified LST liquidity
Get Started

Babylon Pricing

Babylon

Free (rewards vary)

Free

  • Native BTC staking (no wrapping)
  • Self-custodial via Bitcoin script
  • Secures PoS chains
  • LST ecosystem on top
  • Trustless slashing design
Get Started

Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Sanctum is the better pick if you need unifies fragmented solana lst liquidity. Babylon wins when stake native btc without wrapping or bridging. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.