Sherlock vs QuillAudits
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Sherlock and QuillAudits — pricing, features, and which one wins for different use cases.
Sherlock
Audit contests plus smart-contract coverage backed by a researcher network
Sherlock takes a distinctive approach to audits: rather than assigning a fixed in-house team, it builds each engagement from an 11,000+ researcher network, using performance data to match proven speci…
Full review →QuillAudits
High-volume Web3 auditor with 1,400+ audits across many chains
QuillAudits is a high-volume Web3 security auditor that has completed 1,400+ audits, reviewed over a million lines of code, and secured several billion dollars in digital assets across a wide range of…
Full review →Feature Comparison
| Feature | Sherlock | QuillAudits |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Continuous Monitoring | ✗ | ✓ |
| Upgrade Management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sig Governance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public Reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Emergency Response | ✓ | ✓ |
| Contract Library | ✗ | ✗ |
| Formal Verification | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bug Bounty Management | ✓ | ✗ |
Sherlock Pricing
Sherlock
Audit Contest + Coverage
Custom
- ✓Contest-based audits
- ✓11,000+ researcher network
- ✓Optional smart-contract coverage
- ✓Performance-matched specialists
- ✓Quote-based
QuillAudits Pricing
QuillAudits
Audit Engagement
Custom
- ✓Smart-contract audits (multi-chain)
- ✓Penetration testing
- ✓Security consulting
- ✓Public reports
- ✓Quote-based engagements
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Sherlock is the better pick if you need taps an 11,000+ competitive researcher network. QuillAudits wins when 1,400+ audits and billions secured. Both are production-ready — the right choice depends on your team's workflow and budget.